2023 Unwrapped
What can we learn from the past 12 months? By Chris Goswami
Being righteous after the event – COVID 19
For weeks now, we’ve heard the painful testimony of our politicians. What they did do, didn’t do, and should have done during COVID. Should they have had drinks at number 10? Should we have “eaten out to help out”?
It’s easy to judge with hindsight.
We believe that the passing of my wife’s mother was hastened by COVID. Being isolated, for weeks at a time, when there was a severe COVID outbreak in her care-home, accelerated the spiral downwards of her vascular dementia. She died earlier this year. Other people suffered worse. Some couldn’t even hold a funeral for their loved one.
But it wasn’t “wrong” of Boris Johnson and co to make poor decisions. We all make those. The challenges they faced were immense, and utterly new. On some days, 2,000 people were dying. The word “apocalyptic” was used. In such a crisis, can we honestly say we would have done better? (And the opposite idea, that “more people may have died because of lockdowns” - through missed cancer diagnoses, severe mental health effects and so forth - isn’t being addressed at all).
I feel that mistakes were understandable – even getting together for drinks. I’m trying to imagine being there at number 10. After an exhausting week, filled with death and my failed plans, in the midst of intense emotions, if someone invited me for a drink, I may well have said, “you bet”.
It’s easy to be righteous after the event.
For sure we need basic honesty from politicians when mistakes occur, and we need to make it OK for them to apologise. An early and genuine apology from Boris, instead of the rhetorical trail of: “I didn’t know … to the best of my knowledge ….I was assured that ”, would have defused much that followed.
But society and the media pressurise politicians to make up statements to look good. We place enormous pressure on politicians to take the line of least resistance, to sound convincing, even to lie. A simple apology is seen as weakness.
The surprising difference between humans and machines
Here’s a staggering fact: there is now more funded research into AI than all other science and technology combined. (That’s a heck of a statement).
Here’s an unsurprising fact: in 2023 there was more news on AI than all other science and technology combined.
2023 also saw the world’s first church service devised, written and presented by AI (it wasn’t great). And the world’s first AI Global Summit, hosted by Rishi Sunak. I recently wrote about the disruptive nature of AI and the formation of The AI Christian Partnership. AI will hugely improve our healthcare, education, and efficiency.
But, amidst this global dash to “AI everything”, one question keeps coming up: what ultimately differentiates humans from AI? Is there an essential characteristic of being human that AI can never replace?
We know it’s not “conversation”. Some people say its "understanding" - AI doesn’t understand what it says. But I suggest our definition of “understanding” may need to change. There are even developments taking place to make AI sentient - conscious of itself.
I have heard Christians say “AI doesn’t have a soul” as a kind of end-of-discussion clincher. That is true but it’s also hard to explain – how do you define “soul”?
But for Christians, the answer is simpler, if unexpected.
AI is getting better at everything. There are no sensible limits to what it can learn. It may end up being great at almost everything. But being human means we are not great at everything. Sometimes we struggle sometimes we fail. That gives us empathy, humanity, even dignity.
This frailty, caring, failing is part of being human and it separates us from machines. It’s a kind of weakness God places within us that draws us to him. Someone said, the difference between a computer and a human playing chess isn’t how good they are. It’s the fact that the computer doesn’t care if it wins (… or if it loses). But we care.
God affirms our frailty to Paul in 2 Cor 12. Paul wants to be healed, to be “better”. But God says no …. “my power is made perfect in your weakness”. And Paul responds “then I will boast all the more of my weaknesses for when I am weak then I am strong ”.
And Philip Yancey once wrote, “our weakness is the landing strip for God’s grace”.
It’s through our frailty that God can have a relationship with us. AI will never have a relationship with God, because, apart from other reasons, it doesn’t see that it needs one.
What the Middle East conflict reveals about ourselves
The complex relationship between Israel and Palestine has been discussed many times elsewhere, but does this conflict show us anything about ourselves? I think so.
First, it shows us how fickle our news is. As soon as the October 7 events took place, and for weeks after, it was as though there was no other news. How rapidly we forgot about Ukraine, the terrible floods in Libya, or the earthquake in Morocco to name a few. We are fed reports from whichever region the major media outlets invest in. If they send people to set up camp in Israel, well that’s the news. News from elsewhere is then irrelevant, but it shouldn’t be.
Secondly, it reminds us that as human beings we are not designed to handle a nightly onslaught of traumatising reports and images. The internet and our mobile devices means world-news is real-time, and follows us wherever we go. While staying informed is important - it fuels our prayers and giving – over-exposure leads to a kind of mental exhaustion. Balancing news with content that lifts us is equally important.
Lastly and most poignantly, these events are a blunt reminder of how as humans, we are rubbish at placing ourselves in each other’s shoes. At seeing outside of our own tribe’s perspective. These two people coexisting side by side, having a shared of history back to Abraham, even working together (hundreds of thousands of Palestinians work in Israel), for the most part don’t understand the other’s perceptions, what makes then who they are.
We can also be guilty of that in the church, in all kinds of areas. We can be intolerant of people who have a dearly held, but opposite, view to ours without ever really asking them what their views are.
And LOADS of good things happened in 2023
For example, China – the country that contributes the lion’s share of CO2 reached a ”reverse tipping point” in 2023. That’s encouraging. China has now invested so much in solar, wind and hydro power, and electric vehicles, that its CO2 emissions are set to start shrinking as early as 2024.
Then there is the little-reported story of how the Irish Government is banning smartphones in primary schools. This is a result of parents deciding enough is enough. I love technology. I made my living from the development of mobile-tech in Silicon Valley. However, I am very concerned about the negative impacts of phones on mental health, especially among children. Well done the Irish Government!
And lastly you may recall the coronation of King Charles III back in May. That surprised many of us, because it was so unashamedly Christian. 400 million people worldwide tuned in to join trumpets, fanfares, pomp, and a thoroughly Christian service.
And we can end with Justin Welby’s words that day:
The King of Kings, Jesus Christ, was anointed not to be served, but to serve. … For Jesus Christ announced a Kingdom in which the poor and oppressed are freed from chains of injustice. The blind see. The bruised and broken-hearted are healed.
That’s something that didn’t change in 2023.
Image | DALL-E
Chris Goswami is Associate Minister at Lymm Baptist Church, and a chaplain at Manchester Airport. He blogs regularly at 7minutes.net
Do you have a view? Share your thoughts via our letters' page.
Baptist Times, 22/12/2023